Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 15 July, Telecon 1200 UTC

Are Conrad and Yves going to be able to attend?

Silvia.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:24 PM, erik mannens<erik.mannens@ugent.be> wrote:
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
>
>
>
>
>
> Please, find below the agenda for today's telecon, and apologies for this
> late advert.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=15&month=07&year=2009&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> Raphaël (regrets) & Erik
>
>
>
> ------------
>
>
>
> AGENDA Teleconference
>
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2009-07-15
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Wednesday, 15 July *12:00-13:00 UTC*
>
> Local time:
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=15&month=07&year=2009&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>
>
>
>
>
> 15 July 2009, 1200 UTC
>
>               0500 (West US)
>
>               1300 (Galway)
>
>               1400 (Amsterdam, Paris, Pretoria)
>
>               2100 (Tokyo)
>
>               2200 (Sydney)
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
>
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
>
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
>
> Duration : 60 minutes
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
>
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
>
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
>
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
>
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Chair: Erik
>
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
>
> Scribe: ?
>
> Regrets: Raphaël, Jack
>
>
>
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
>
> members and invited experts only.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. ADMIN:
>
> * Roll call
>
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 10 June 2009 telecon:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-mediafrag-minutes.html
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. UC & REQUIREMENTS:
>
> * ACTION-68: Raphael to ask the Media Annotations WG to review our document
>
> * ACTION-74: Erik and Raphael to request feedback of other groups such
>
> as SYMM, SVG, HTML + WHATWG, WAI, MAWG, TAG, MobileWeb, TimedText
>
> * ACTION-65: Raphael to split current document into i) UC and Req and
>
> ii) Syntax and Processing and setup the diff in xmlspec
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
>
>
>
> 3.1 Syntax: (Yves)
>
> * ACTION-49: Yves to Draft the HTTP-Range syntax for different units
>
> (completing all the syntax for the two way handshake)
>
> * ACTION-84: Erik to summarize the info from Jean Pierre, and mail it to the
> group [Sync with Jean Pierre to get the edit units spec reference]
>
> * ACTION-86: Raphael to bring the 'comma optional' discussion during next
> week telecon, in order to measure the price when releasing the syntax
>
>
>
> 3.2 UA Server HTTP Communication (Conrad/Raphael)
>
> * ACTION-63: Conrad to update the Wiki with his more general approach
>
> with precisely the same examples
>
> * ACTION-69: Conrad to draw a representation of the general structure of
>
> a media resource, for streamable formats
>
> * ACTION-80: Conrad to provide some rational and use cases for his proposal
>
>
>
> 3.3 UA MF Resolution and Processing: (Michael)
>
> * ACTION-64: Michael to write into the WD section 6.4, what the client
>
> should do with #everything after the hash : "Client Side Media Fragment
>
> Resolution" (See also ISSUE-7)
>
> * ACTION-85: Michael to update resolution page, TC pages with that
> resolution [consensus that 416 is the correct response when the TC returns
> EMPTY]
>
>
>
>
>
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
>
> * See: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TestCases
>
> * ACTION-87: Michael to add the HTTP status code for all TC
>
>
>
>
>
> 5. ISSUES
>
> * ISSUE-3 [Michael]: Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to update
>
> MIME Type registrations?
>
> ** ACTION-76: Erik to contact the editors of MPEG-21 Part 17 regarding
>
> the registry of their scheme
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
>
> client-side
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
>
> ** ACTION-62: Yves to ask the TAG whether transcoding should be
>
> forbidden or not when we send a fragment of a resource
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
>
> ** ACTION-82: Michael to flesh out TC vocabulary re ISSUE-9
>
>
>
> Can be closed?
>
> * ISSUE-4 (Should we pre-define some track names?)
>
> * ISSUE-10 (Media Fragments Test Case Maintenance ) [Michael]
>
>
>
>
>
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
>
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
>
> implement the logic on client side
>
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
>
> logic could be implemented on client side
>
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
>
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
>
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
>
> implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
>
> parsing
>
>
>
>
>
> 7. AOB
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 09:42:15 UTC