- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:48:37 +0200
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
At 11:40 +0100 13/07/09, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >David, > >> correct, but I don't think they need to be; the fragment details are >> in the referenced specifications, so the fragment scheme is defined >> for both, in the formal sense... > >Frankly, I'm not totally convinced. If you compare the application/mp21 >registration with application/xhtml+xml [1] you will find that there the >fragment identifiers semantics have been explicitly mentioned. > >Thoughts? If that section is in the MIME registration but not the spec of XHTML 1.0, I am not sure that's right, as the two documents have to be in sync.. If it's in both, we hope that they agree, and I'm afraid of overlap. mpeg-4 and mpeg-21 chose to take the route that the mime registration was merely a registration, a pointer from the code point (the mime type) to the spec. Is that a problem? > >Cheers, > Michael > >[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3236#section-3 > >-- >Dr. Michael Hausenblas >LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >Ireland, Europe >Tel. +353 91 495730 >http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >http://sw-app.org/about.html > > > >> From: David Singer <singer@apple.com> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:47:20 +0200 >> To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> >> Cc: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, Media Fragment >> <public-media-fragment@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: ACTION-76 : Question if MPEG-21 Part 17 got registered on IANA >> as a media mime type for fragments >> Resent-From: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:49:48 +0000 >> >> At 19:40 +1000 13/07/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >>> I checked the documents - while the mime types are registered, the >>> proposed fragment addressing schemes are not part of those >>> registration documents. I think that was the point that Erik was >>> trying to make. If this is incorrect, please explain - maybe the >>> fragment addressing schemes were registered differently. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Silvia. >> >> correct, but I don't think they need to be; the fragment details are >> in the referenced specifications, so the fragment scheme is defined >> for both, in the formal sense... >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, David Singer<singer@apple.com> wrote: >>>> The MPEG-21 and MPEG-4 media types are both registered, MPEG-21 recently. >>>> >>>> From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-mime@iana.org> >>>> >>>> Date: July 8, 2009 2:22:47 AM GMT+02:00 >>>> >>>> Cc: christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at, singer@apple.com >>>> >>>> Subject: [IANA #249445] Media Type Registration Reviews - >>>>Standards Tree/No >>>> Internet Draft >>>> >>>> Reply-To: iana-mime@iana.org >>>> >>>> Dear Christian and David, >>>> >>>> Per the IESG, IANA has registered the following media type with >>>> David as the point of contact: >>>> >>>> application/mp21 >>>> >>>> Please see >>>> >>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ >>>> >>>> If you need to update the contact information, please send a >>>> message to iana@iana.org. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Amanda Baber >>>> Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> At 10:34 +0200 8/07/09, erik mannens wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> As one of the MPEG-21 editors notified, they did not register >>>>any mime-type >>>> for their fragmenting scheme (as we expected). During the next phoneconf >>>> this action can therefore be closed. >>>> >>>> Sincere greetings, >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: myriam [mailto:myriam.amielh@cisra.canon.com.au] >>>> Sent: donderdag 2 juli 2009 1:58 >>>> To: erik mannens >>>> Cc: sylvain.devillers@francetelecom.com >>>> Subject: Re: Quick question if MPEG-21 Part 17 got registered >>>>on IANA as a >>>> media mime type for fragments >>>> >>>> Dear Eric, >>>> no we did not propose any mime type registration. > >>> feel free to contact me again should you have any questions, >>>> Best regards >>>> Myriam >>>> >>>> Research Manager >>>> Canon Information System Research Australia >>>> >>>> erik mannens wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Myriam, Sylvain, >>>>> >>>>> As co-chair of W3C's Media Fragments group [1] I ask you as editors of >>>>> MPEG-21 Part 17 if your fragmenting scheme was ever registered as a >>>>> media mime type for fragments on IANA? Thanks in advance for the >>>>> prompt reply and have a nice day. >>>>> >>>>> Sincere greetings, >>>>> >>>>> Erik Mannens >>>>> >>>>> Project Manager >>>>> >>>>> Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 >>>>> >>>>> B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium >>>>> >>>>> T: +32 9 331 49 93 >>>>> >>>>> F: +32 9 331 48 96 >>>>> >>>>> M: +32 473 27 44 17 >>>>> >>>>> http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be >>>>> >>>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> David Singer >>>> Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> -- >> David Singer >> Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc. >> -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 10:49:48 UTC