Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 02 December, Telecon 1000 UTC

Raphael,

have you been able to work on section 5? I don't really see a need for
a teleconf unless we have actually made any progress.

Best Regards,
Silvia.

2009/12/2 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
>
> Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=02&month=12&year=2009&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>
> Yves will be our scribe (Conrad is on deck). Actions opened:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
> Best regards.
>
>  Erik & Raphaël
>
> ------------
>
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2009-12-02
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday, 02 December *10:00-11:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=02&month=12&year=2009&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>
> 02 December 2009, 1000 UTC
>             0200 (West US)
>             1000 (Galway)
>             1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
>             1900 (Tokyo)               *NEW HOUR*
>             2100 (Sydney)              *NEW HOUR*
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Chair: Raphael
> Regrets: Erik, Jack
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
> Scribe: Yves (On Deck: Conrad)
>
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
> members and invited experts only.
>
> 1. ADMIN:
> * Roll call
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 25 November 2009
> telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * Next F2F Meeting? Media Annotations WG will meet 2 days in the week
> Feb 22 - 26, 2010 in Korea. Should we meet there?
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42785/february-f2f/results
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
> (ongoing ... re-raise around 15/01/10)
>
> 2. UC & REQUIREMENTS:
> * ACTION-122: Raphael to drop "-spec" for the short URI of the spec document
>
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
>
> 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
> * Bug in the npt specification found by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
>
> 3.2 UA Server HTTP Communication: (Conrad/Raphael)
> * ACTION-112: Raphael to Propose a digest of Conrad and current's
> proposal regarding the use of existing and custom headers for the
> communication UA server
>
> 3.3 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
> Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
>
> 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
> * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
>
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
> * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/
> * ACTION-108: Michael to add the missing test cases in corrib
> * ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt
> empty, undefined, etc
> * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases
> (+/- 20)
> * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications
> mailing list and notifications
> * Question of MF URI validity by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
>
> 5. IMPLEMENTATION:
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
> implement the logic on client side
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
> logic could be implemented on client side
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
> implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
> parsing
> * ACTION-120: Erik to get URL for MF server, and post to group
>
> 6. ISSUES
>
> 6.1 Active:
> None.
>
> 6.2 Non-Active:
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
> client-side
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
> * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS)
> Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
> * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register
> the fragment scheme for all media types
>
> 7. AOB
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 06:29:12 UTC