- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:57:25 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear Fantasai, Thanks for your comments. > a) Having an editor's draft posing as an official W3C Working Draft > is confusing. Please use the Editor's Draft style sheet and status, > at least until you have a resolution to publish and are waiting for > webreq to act. (An example of an Editor's Draft can be found here: > <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/>.) I agree with that and sorry for the confusion. The main problem is that XMLSpec does not support this style sheet. I think we will move away from using XMLSpec for generating the documents and therefore will be able to use this specific style sheet for Editor's Draft. > b) I think putting 'spec' in your shortname is a waste of URL space. > We're in the business of publishing specs: that's what we put > in the /TR space. Just call it /TR/media-fragments/. It's friendlier > and less redundant. Imho. Indeed, this has been discussed during our last telecon [1]. The group agrees to drop the "-spec" as short name but keep the suffix for the other documents (e.g. "-req"). Best regards. Raphaël [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#item02 -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:58:33 UTC