- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:37:43 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all, The minutes of last week telecon (25/11/09) have not been sent yet to the mailing list. Here they are ... Cheers. Raphaël ------------- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 25 Nov 2009 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-irc Attendees Present +0329331aaaa, +1.403.516.aabb, jackjansen, conrad, mhausenblas, +61.2.801.2.aacc, silvia, erik, Jack, Michael Regrets raphael Chair erik Scribe jackjansen Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]1 admin 2. [5]2 - short name issue 3. [6]3.2 HTTP 4. [7]3.3 - track and id handling 5. [8]3.4 discovery of track and named fragments * [9]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 25 November 2009 <scribe> scribe: jackjansen <scribe> ScribeNick: jackjansen [10]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/CheatSheet [10] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/CheatSheet 1 admin erik: accept minutes [11]http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html [11] http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html <mhausenblas> +1 <erik> +1 all: yes erik: accept minutes [12]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/18-mediafrag-minutes.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/18-mediafrag-minutes.html <erik> +1 all: yes erik: Michael, will you be able to go to Seoul? Michael: no, other obligation erik: will get back to the f2f issue next week ... on action-92, postponed until spec is out ... philippe said publication would be ok today or tomorrow. We wait. <erik> [13]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spe c/ [13] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ erik: what do you all think of current state of the spec? michael: comment on section 5 needs addressing jack: wants to think about forward compatibility. ... forward compatibility is tricky: should have a way whereby newer implementations can retroactively ... tell older implementations to fail or ignore new feature erik: michael, did Yves suggest we need an implementation? michael: right ... let's address in the next draft jack: +1 <erik> +1 conrad: yes, publish now erik: how many implementations do we have? Ours ... yves has one jack: mine is rusty. Will brush up in coming few weeks. erik: silvia? conrad? implementations? conrad: have uri handling, not full syntax yet. In the next few months. ... will work with silvia and ogg community erik: we have server-side implementation. ... is up for testing, will post url. <scribe> ACTION: erik to get URL for MF server, and post to group [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-120 - Get URL for MF server, and post to group [on Erik Mannens - due 2009-12-02]. 2 - short name issue erik: should we omit -spec? michael: yes <silvia> I have client side implementation with HTML5 jackjansen: so we use short name for spec, and add suffices for aux documents all: yes. ACTION on Raphael to fix document names <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - on ACTION Raphaël to fix document names <trackbot> Created ACTION-121 - Fix document names [on Raphaël Troncy - due 2009-12-02]. TOPIC 3.1 media fragment syntax erik: lets keep for next week 3.2 HTTP erik: again, let's table 3.3 - track and id handling erik: COnrads proposal, [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fra gments [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments silvia: need to wait on section 5 to be done. ... may jump in myself. ... Raphaël was working on section 3, don't think on 5 yet ... I will coordinate with him if I also start to edit. erik: I will ping Raphaël. silvia: we are missing all our publishing windows. ... and section 5 really needs work before publishing, to reflect changes to 3. michael: should we really wait until 5 is complete? silvia: yes, it contradicts 3 at the moment, I will look over it. ... three sections in section 3 have no counterpart in section 5 ... must be fixed. ... cannot publish now, action-112 needs to be fixed. michael: silvia, can you take this offline with Raphaël? erik: I will call Raphaël today, tell that Silvia does not want to publish until action-112 and ... section 5 issues are resolved. ... I will send an email tonight on what the status is. silvia: if it is needed I can put in time this weekend. 3.4 discovery of track and named fragments silvia: I wrote about this in my blog. [16]http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structu re-of-a-composite-media-resource/ [16] http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/ <erik> rssagent, draft minutes jack: not sure if the blog post doesn't need to be split into two: mechanism (roe, mpeg-21) versus ... application (semantics) ... thinks only mechanism is relevant to MF ... will try to write something up. erik: will get back to it next week. ... Let's adjourn. ok. see you next week! <mhausenblas> hm, seems Zakim didn't pick up the attendees Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: erik to get URL for MF server, and post to group [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:38:28 UTC