- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:24:19 +1000
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, \"Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, "\"Media <Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Philip Jägenstedt<philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:56:36 +0200, Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org> > wrote: > >> 2009/8/23 Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>: >>> >>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:54:02 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer >>> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 2009/8/22 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: >>>>>> >>>>>> just came across this on whatwg. I think it also applies to our aspect >>>>>> fragment addressing, right? >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. The aspect ratio is defined in our document as a way to crop an >>>>> image to a centered area given the defined aspect ratio. We then write: >>>>> "The original media is cropped either horizontally or vertically to the >>>>> maximum size that has the given aspect ratio." >>>>> I realize that we have no use case that clearly shows the need for such >>>>> a >>>>> feature. Perhaps we could add one, what do you think? >>>> >>>> Yes, I do think we need a use case for aspect - when I re-read this >>>> part recently, I found it a strange MF addressing type. If you have an >>>> idea, please share / add. >>> >>> I think the only use case if fixing files which are incorrectly encoded >>> or >>> for file formats that simply can't contain aspect ratio information. This >>> was actually in HTML5 before but was dropped because it wasn't seen as >>> very >>> important. >> >> That sounds like adding information which isn't present in the >> resource for some reason. It doesn't seem like it has anything to do >> with accessing or addressing the resource. >> >> Also it sounds like the use case is to give a hint to a custom HTML5 >> video application, which then uses javascript to render to the correct >> aspect. Surely that custom hint could just as easily be given in a >> different <video> attribute or within the page javascript or >> something? > > Yep, I have no objections to MF not having an aspect ratio syntax. Yeah, I tend towards that, too. But I wasn't part of the discussions that brought it in, so I'm curious about what use cases people had in mind. Silvia.
Received on Sunday, 23 August 2009 13:25:14 UTC