- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:26:29 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> The term URI doesn't seem to include relative references according to > what I forwarded. So, the creation of web addresses such as > "../test/video.ogv#t=12.50" is not covered when using the term URI. > This was what triggered my email. I'm not sure I understand the issue :-( Do you claim that: ./resource.txt#frag01 is *not* a valid URI? It is according to Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier#Examples_of_URI_references Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 21:27:35 UTC