- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:15:30 +0200
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- CC: "Silvia <Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>"@cwi.nl, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Why does MF need to define any UI or rendering? If it does, it only > risks being subtly incompatible with other specs (notably HTML5). The > scope should be simply stating what the time range is, what the aspect > ratio is and so on and letting the rest be external to MF. I think I generally agree. We haven't defined yet any URI or rendering anyway. The only thing we haven't clearly yet specified (but we might do) is what the server should serve to the UA in case a media fragment defined with an aspect ratio is requested. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:16:37 UTC