- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:29:24 +1000
- To: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
2009/4/30 Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>: > 2009/4/29 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: >> - The ',' is mandatory in case a time segment is specified, consequently, >> TC0008 is not a legal media fragment URI. The output should be: the whole >> resource is sent and the UA seeks to 10s. >> >> The various empty time/segment/track/id test cases need indeed to be further >> discussed. >> >>> + TC0008, though desirable, will currently fail due to our MF Grammar >> >> Yes. >> Actually, TC0008 and TC0009 captures the same thing ... i.e., do not break >> the current behavior of the hash when one does not enter the media frag URI >> syntax. > > Is there any particular reason for not allowing this "legacy deep linking"? > > I'd suggest there is a use-case for this, where someone wants to point > to the start of an interesting scene, or a link that skips the > trailers. It actually takes quite a bit more manual work to decide on > an end point, and I think it would be fair to imply an end-point of > "the end of the resource" if none is explicitly given. In any case, > "the end of the resource" is something already known by the server, so > it's a bit redundant (even inaccurate) to force a document author to > find it out and encode it in the URL. > > To clarify, if the resource on the server is 20s in duration, then I > think the offsets t=10 and t=10,20 should produce the same result. > > > Just today I found this interesting offset: > http://www.archive.org/download/Mushroom_Attack/Mushroom_Attack.ogv?t=1:13:00 > > and, really, the movie just gets better and better from that point > onwards. Do I really need to define an end point? I wish it would > never end! but alas, as with all stories involving mutant fungus, it > does. I am with Conrad on this (the technical reasoning, not the mushroom movie!). Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 14:30:21 UTC