- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:21:52 +0200
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Michael, > As of my ACTION-64 [1] regarding the 'User Agent Media Fragment Resolution > and Processing' I have started to describe the necessary steps on the Wiki > [2]. Comments (best inline in the Wiki) are very welcome! Nice work! Btw, I appreciate graffle diagrams, can you also output svg? I think you can also export visio diagrams :-) I wish to have OmniGraffle on Windows, but it is unlikely to come according to the omni group! Regarding the content, your step 2 reads: "IFF the T.fragment is VALID, the processing continues, ELSE essentially three alternative behaviors are possible: (i) fallback to default behavior, (ii) notify user and then fall back, or (iii) notify user and await instructions. One SHOULD take the Common User Agent Problems into account." with the note: "we have to decide what we do here." I think we have not much to decide ... if there is a fragment which is invalid according to the MF grammar, then it might be a very well valid html or xml fragment for example. So the answer should be: "(i) fallback to default behavior". What is the use case for which you would like to notify the user? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 10:26:51 UTC