- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:32:56 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Hi again, :-) I knew that giving lots of input would require lots of discussions. :-) Well, here goes. :) 2009/4/14 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: >> Section 8.1 >> >> * (minor text change:) first paragraph: replace "There exists already" >> with "There exist already" > > I have overwritten this, as my grammar dictionary told me: "There existS > already ..." + singular "a number of URI schemes" is not singular... Let's also remove the "already", which makes it sound silly. >> Section 8.3.2.2 MPEG-7 >> >> * 8.3.2.2.2 should add after the example what it actually describes. >> Something like: "This MPEG-7 example describes a spatial mask called >> "speaker" which is given by the coordinates (40, 300), (105,210), >> (???), (320,240)." (and can somebody please clarify what that middle >> bit is?) > > "???" meant to be "..." for reflecting the complete definition of the > polygon. If it's a polygon, it could be any point. None of the given points line up with each other, so I don't think there is a clear way to work out what the missing point is supposed to be. May I suggest using something more obvious like (40, 300), (40,210), (???), (320,300) - then the missing point is obivously (320, 210). Or am I misunderstanding coordinates? Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 14:33:48 UTC