Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5

Dear Silvia,

> I have no monopoly on these chapters - these suggestions are things we
> should all decide together.

I know, I know ... but the fastest way to go forward, is 1/ to do some 
changes and 2/ listening to the ones who complain, rather than 
discussing what could be changed and take then actions to implement 
these changes. My target is a publication after tomorrow's telecon, so 
I'm happy to implement changes asap and endorse them tomorrow on the call.

> The only objection I have is with removing the numbering from sections
> 4 - if we do that, it will be impossible to easily refer to them
> later. At minimum I would suggest using a numbered list.

I agree, we need to refer to them. After a second thought, subsection 
headings are not bad :-) We could even further identify these 
requirements with a label 'rxx' in the line of [1]

> Re: the "Evaluation of Fitness" table - I agree, the table is a real
> obstacle to readability. Maybe we could move it into an addendum,
> since it is analysing implementation-specific points?

+1, you can add another annex with this table and simply refer to it in 
the section 5.5

> Also, I think section 4 (requirements) should probably go further up -
> maybe section 5 first, then section 4, then section 3.

Hum, I agree the requirements are important, but we extract them from 
the scenarios. Completely reversing the order could give the impression 
that we had the dimensions and we have imagined scenarios to justify 
them. So I think the most logical order is: a) scenario, b) four 
dimensions, c) additional requirements
Cheers.

   Raphaël

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:40:51 UTC