W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102

From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:15:10 +0000
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>
CC: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Stefan Håkansson <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CY1PR00MB0139EE188DF223B3CAAF9556ECD50@CY1PR00MB0139.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>

From: Varun Singh
Sent: Friday, March 16, 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102
To: Peter Thatcher
Cc: Cullen Jennings, Stefan Håkansson, WebRTC WG, public-media-capture@w3.org

We’d be interested in joining although prefer the meeting decoupled from the IETF.

Is there a good reason to couple the interim with the IETF?

[BA] People often go on vacation during summer and early fall. Nowadays companies are often parsimonious about travel so piggybacking on another meeting could provide some savings. But the only real constraint is where people are willing to go and when they can make it there.

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 at 14.30, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com<mailto:pthatcher@google.com>> wrote:
I think meeting on a weekend would make it much more likely that we'd miss important participants.  Personally, I'd vote strongly against a Sunday meeting.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:09 AM Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca<mailto:fluffy@iii.ca>> wrote:

I think a 1.5 day meeting on the sat/sun before IETF 102 would make sense.

I would like to spend a bunch of the time talking about what is the actually functionality we don't have today that we would like to add or improve and whiteboard out ways we might do it.

On Mar 14, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com<mailto:pthatcher@google.com>> wrote:

I think NV is an important topic and it makes sense to have a f2f meeting about it.  I'm inclined to say the more time the better (a half day doesn't seem like enough).  Two days sounds great, but it seems hard to squeeze two days into an IETF week(end).

A long time ago, we had f2f interims independent of IETF meetings.  Would one of those make sense?

I'm fine either way (piggybacking on IETF or not).  My main concern would be that enough people come that it would be a worthwhile meeting.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:12 AM Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com<mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:

we'd like to know what people feel about arranging a f2f the weekend
before IETF 102 in Montreal. (Meaning July 13-14)

We've heard wishes to discuss how we should get started on NV, and other
topics (like testing, or getting webrtc-pc to PR, for example) could
perhaps also be fruitful to discuss.

So, would this be a good idea? If so, should it be a
half-day/full-day/two-day meeting? What topics should we focus on?

All input is welcome!

Stefan for the chairs

Founder, CEO, callstats.io<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcallstats.io&data=04%7C01%7CBernard.Aboba%40microsoft.com%7C3afe56d4517c48a2434308d58b8ecbc1%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636568367776461723%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=24CuXF%2Fgd4AMfF11pVVqHAk627xu9TGVJXW9JtbYqjE%3D&reserved=0>

Interested in networking, media quality, and diagnostics.
We are hiring!: www.callstats.io/jobs/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.callstats.io%2Fjobs%2F&data=04%7C01%7CBernard.Aboba%40microsoft.com%7C3afe56d4517c48a2434308d58b8ecbc1%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636568367776471744%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=UNgt8ftKDt9YwQmKmCl7JEITGt4TnceHYG6%2FaTPyIa8%3D&reserved=0>
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2018 14:15:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:41 UTC