Re: deviceId persistence behavior - please review PR#373

The PR looks reasonable and correct to me.

.            .       .    .  . ...Joe

Joe Berkovitz
President
Noteflight LLC

+1 978 314 6271

49R Day Street
Somerville MA 02144
USA

"Bring music to life"
www.noteflight.com

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> at last (joint webrtc wg and mediacapture tf) virtual interim meeting we
> agreed (see minutes [1] and summary [2]) we agreed that Jan-Ivar would
> supply a PR that added to the spec the option for UAs to deal with
> pre-grant deviceId persistence in a more cookie-like way  (the other
> option would be to deal with it as specced right now: no persistence
> allowed before a granted gUM call).
>
> Jan-Ivar has since the meeting produced a PR [3]. To me personally it
> looks reasonable, but we'd like more eyes reviewing it.
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-webrtc-minutes
> [2]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2016Jul/0012.html
> (look for Issue #359)
> [3] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/373
>
>