- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:39:51 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Hi, > On 04 Sep 2015, at 16:06, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > The Chairs have suggested that we use some of our time at the F2F next > week [1] to determine our approach with regard to the proposed new Timed > Media Working Group, and have asked that I organize that discussion. [...] > * while the group hasn't formed yet, it would be useful to start thinking which specs we might want to move there; the relevant specs are: > - Media Capture and Streams > - MediaStream Recording > - MediaStream Image Capture > - Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions The editors of mediacapture-depth would be supportive of moving to the Timed Media WG. Also recently started mediacapture-worker (not on the list, since no FPWD yet) indicates preference for moving, see: https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-worker/#sotd > - Media Capture from DOM Elements > - Audio output devices API > - Screen Capture > ( - MediaStream with worker ) [...] Thanks, -Anssi > 1. https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/September_9_-_10_2015#Sept_9th >
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 08:40:22 UTC