W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Timed Media WG discussion

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:39:51 +0000
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E7335E62-818F-4E4E-B601-F9FDAA9F6152@intel.com>
Hi,

> On 04 Sep 2015, at 16:06, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> The Chairs have suggested that we use some of our time at the F2F next
> week [1] to determine our approach with regard to the proposed new Timed
> Media Working Group, and have asked that I organize that discussion.

[...]

> * while the group hasn't formed yet, it would be useful to start thinking which specs we might want to move there; the relevant specs are:
> - Media Capture and Streams
> - MediaStream Recording
> - MediaStream Image Capture
> - Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions

The editors of mediacapture-depth would be supportive of moving to the Timed Media WG.

Also recently started mediacapture-worker (not on the list, since no FPWD yet) indicates preference for moving, see:

https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-worker/#sotd

> - Media Capture from DOM Elements
> - Audio output devices API
> - Screen Capture
> ( - MediaStream with worker )

[...]

Thanks,

-Anssi


> 1. https://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/September_9_-_10_2015#Sept_9th
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 08:40:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:34 UTC