Re: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API

This looks quite good IMO.

But, for microphone and camera permissions, would it not make sense to 
have a list of devideIds? For the situation where the UA has stored 
permissions (for this origin) to use camera A and B but not C?

(Slightly different from all-cameras).

Stefan

On 16/11/15 21:42, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I tried to think a bit about how I would formalize the permissions model
> we have designed for WebRTC in terms of the permissions API's
> permissions model.
>
> After a while, it seemed to make sense, and I'd like to share it to see
> if it makes sense to others.
>
> The Google doc is here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/13c4hTlm2XgVYpxfGL1a8fcvI1CAUdIgd662DfElk_ow/edit#heading=h.fb7kn49jp9ff
>
> Anyone with the link should be able to comment, if you want to comment
> off-list.
>
> The content is attached as PDF, which may be more accessible to some
> (and is certainly more archivable).
>
> Questions to ask:
>
> - Is this something worth doing?
> - If yes: Is this something that should be part of our core docs, a
> separate doc, part of the permissions doc, or in some "other" category?
> - Where did I go wrong?
>
> Comments welcome!
>
> Harald
>

Received on Monday, 30 November 2015 07:48:43 UTC