- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:04:23 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Mathieu Hofman <Mathieu.Hofman@citrix.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "annevk@annevk.nl" <annevk@annevk.nl>
2015-05-19 12:45 GMT+02:00 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>: > So until now, we can summarize: > > - There are people saying that they can imagine use cases where making > MediaStreamTrack objects available in a Worker is useful > > - There are no people saying that making getUserMedia() available in a > Web Worker makes any sort of sense > > - There is one browser maker (Mozilla) that has said that implementing > access to the MediaStreamTrack object in a Worker is a major engineering > effort - so it's not cheap. > > Not sure what conclusions to draw from that.... If it becomes so complex to implemente (and I understand it) then this is not about just adding [Exposed] to the interface. I would just delay it. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 11:05:13 UTC