Re: [Exposed] attribute on our APIs from Martin Thomson on 2015-05-19 (public-media-capture@w3.org from May 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:29:47 -0700
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Mathieu Hofman <Mathieu.Hofman@citrix.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "annevk@annevk.nl" <annevk@annevk.nl>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUmVWO+TnsMjCe=2go0+17Mf0NuRgQWL-Bp=aO973FJzw@mail.gmail.com>

On 19 May 2015 at 03:45, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> - There is one browser maker (Mozilla) that has said that implementing
> access to the MediaStreamTrack object in a Worker is a major engineering
> effort - so it's not cheap.

To be clear, I don't think that Workers are the problem, as long as it
is a dedicated worker.  The problem with structured clone is that it
implies postMessage, which for us could mean cross process transfer of
the media.

Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 16:30:20 UTC