On 24/06/15 17:12, Martin Thomson wrote: > I think that, in general, you should not interpret silence as assent. I agree, that's why we called out that we were going to do that in this case. > > If there is evidence that these proposals are going to be implemented, > that would help a great deal. Also, the second should not be cast as > track capabilities, they are device capabilities. > > On Jun 23, 2015 12:16 AM, "Stefan Håkansson LK" > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > we've recently received two proposals from the Audio WG as a result of > the Last Call (and the following discussions) of Media Capture and > Streams: > > * Add a constraint/capability for channelCount [1] > > * Add MediaTrackCapabilities discovery via enumerateDevices() [2] > > There has been very little list traffic related to these proposals. We > will consider the silence as an indication of that the Media Capture TF > considers the proposals being reasonable, and ask for PR's for the spec, > unless we hear anything else by Monday next week. > > Stefan for the chairs > > [1] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0031.html > > [2] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0034.html >Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 20:10:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:33 UTC