Re: Accepting Audio WG proposals

On 24/06/15 17:12, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I think that, in general, you should not interpret silence as assent.

I agree, that's why we called out that we were going to do that in this 
case.

>
> If there is evidence that these proposals are going to be implemented,
> that would help a great deal. Also, the second should not be cast as
> track capabilities, they are device capabilities.
>
> On Jun 23, 2015 12:16 AM, "Stefan Håkansson LK"
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     we've recently received two proposals from the Audio WG as a result of
>     the Last Call (and the following discussions) of Media Capture and
>     Streams:
>
>     * Add a constraint/capability for channelCount [1]
>
>     * Add MediaTrackCapabilities discovery via enumerateDevices() [2]
>
>     There has been very little list traffic related to these proposals. We
>     will consider the silence as an indication of that the Media Capture TF
>     considers the proposals being reasonable, and ask for PR's for the spec,
>     unless we hear anything else by Monday next week.
>
>     Stefan for the chairs
>
>     [1]
>     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0031.html
>
>     [2]
>     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0034.html
>