W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Accepting Audio WG proposals

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:12:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUjyk213Tg3YzbqezzzwPuhEqmOhJXSKH1PS-KS4c+HxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
I think that, in general, you should not interpret silence as assent.

If there is evidence that these proposals are going to be implemented, that
would help a great deal. Also, the second should not be cast as track
capabilities, they are device capabilities.
On Jun 23, 2015 12:16 AM, "Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK" <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> we've recently received two proposals from the Audio WG as a result of
> the Last Call (and the following discussions) of Media Capture and Streams:
>
> * Add a constraint/capability for channelCount [1]
>
> * Add MediaTrackCapabilities discovery via enumerateDevices() [2]
>
> There has been very little list traffic related to these proposals. We
> will consider the silence as an indication of that the Media Capture TF
> considers the proposals being reasonable, and ask for PR's for the spec,
> unless we hear anything else by Monday next week.
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0031.html
>
> [2]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0034.html
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 15:12:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:33 UTC