Re: Accepting Audio WG proposals

I think that, in general, you should not interpret silence as assent.

If there is evidence that these proposals are going to be implemented, that
would help a great deal. Also, the second should not be cast as track
capabilities, they are device capabilities.
On Jun 23, 2015 12:16 AM, "Stefan Håkansson LK" <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> we've recently received two proposals from the Audio WG as a result of
> the Last Call (and the following discussions) of Media Capture and Streams:
>
> * Add a constraint/capability for channelCount [1]
>
> * Add MediaTrackCapabilities discovery via enumerateDevices() [2]
>
> There has been very little list traffic related to these proposals. We
> will consider the silence as an indication of that the Media Capture TF
> considers the proposals being reasonable, and ask for PR's for the spec,
> unless we hear anything else by Monday next week.
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0031.html
>
> [2]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0034.html
>
>