Re: Timed Media Working Group and Media Capture Task Force

+1 in support.
Would like to see this WG support Media Capture part.
Thanks

BR,
CTai

2015-07-08 0:13 GMT+08:00 Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>:

> Hi Dom,
>
> > On 07 Jul 2015, at 13:45, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > As you may be aware, there are ongoing discussions on the chartering of
> a new media-dedicated Working Group in W3C:
> >  http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/timed-media-wg.html
> >
> > While there is still much uncertainty as to whether and when such a
> charter would be adopted, I have received suggestions that such a group
> might be the right host for some of the specifications developed in our
> Media Capture Task Force, should it happen that the WebRTC and Device APIs
> Working Group choose to stop working on them.
> >
> > I have thus prepared some text for the Timed Media Working Group charter
> that would enable them to pick up our work should we choose to ask it:
> >
> https://github.com/dontcallmedom/charter-html/commit/653789703cf74ac89cf7f2ce899aa68bcbea3b1a
> >
> > This doesn't force us to move it there at any time, nor does it grant
> any special right to that would-be new group — it would simply make it easy
> to do so if we were to choose such an option.
> >
> > Given this, and given that the resulting charter would go through an AC
> review in any case, I'm going to send that suggestion as a pull request
> tomorrow; but if someone can think of a strong reason why I should not do
> so, please let me know ASAP.
>
> +1 in support.
>
> My expectation is this means the proposed Timed Media WG does not need to
> go through rechartering (which can be costly) should it adopt the
> deliverables of the TF ("The Timed Media Working Group may produce
> specifications for the following features").
>
> > (sorry for the short heads-up, but as some of you know, getting all
> stars to line up for a charter is a challenge)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi