- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:01:51 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 17/12/15 09:59, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: > >> On 14 Dec 2015, at 14:00, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> in order to allow people to get a better feeling of how it would work >> with notifying via this mail list the opening and closing of github >> Issues and Pull Requests, we extend the trial [1] to the media capture >> documents. As (we think) most people are subscribing to both lists, this >> will give a more accurate picture of how many more emails you will get. >> >> As stated in [1] we plan to let this run for 30 days before concluding, >> all feedback is appreciated (but it might be wise to hold off comments a >> while to gain some experience). Refer to [1] for more detail and background. >> >> The media capture documents tracked are: >> >> mediacapture-main >> mediacapture-depth >> mediacapture-fromelement >> mediacapture-output >> mediacapdture-record >> mediacapture-image >> mediacapture-screen-share > > You missed mediacapture-worker. > > Was it intentional since it is not yet a FPWD? It was intentional. If my memory serves we decided that mediacapture-worker would be developed under the Media Capture TF umbrella, but do most work on github with little discussion on the mail list since people felt that the TF had more than enough on its plate already. As a consequence we figured the notification for -worker should not go to the list. Cheers, Stefan > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > >> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015Dec/0021.html > >
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 10:02:32 UTC