Re: Missing definitions for parameters in MediaTrackCapabilties/MediaTrackConstraints?

Den 21. april 2015 21:46, skrev Martin Thomson:
> On 21 April 2015 at 12:23, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> How does having a registry prevent all that? It seems incumbent on any new
>> spec (from w3c or elsewhere) extending the mediaStream API, to document new
>> constraints and to do so in WebIDL (with partial dictionary etc).
> 
> 
> Harald is perhaps concerned about different forks coordinating with
> each other.  That is the usual role of a registry.  Given that this is
> an API implemented by a small set of browsers, I don't see that being
> an issue in practice.  Also, we have this task force/working group
> thing that likely serves in the coordination role.
> 

I certainly hope not to have this working group ten years from now.

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 06:41:55 UTC