Re: Missing definitions for parameters in MediaTrackCapabilties/MediaTrackConstraints?

On 04/20/2015 07:53 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 20 April 2015 at 05:40, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> There's more text on what they mean in section 14.1, "Track
>> Constrainable Property Registration".
>
> Can we remove the registry?  Is there any reason that we can't simply
> maintain the document with the definitions of the things we are using?
>
Only if we want to subscribe to the "living standard" hypothesis, and to
the hypothesis that the W3C WG is the only body that will ever want to
register a constraint.

Not saying that we need to make one or the other decision, but trying to
make sure we all agree to the consequences of the decision.

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

Received on Monday, 20 April 2015 18:43:14 UTC