- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:02:00 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 20/04/2015 19:53, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 20 April 2015 at 05:40, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> There's more text on what they mean in section 14.1, "Track >> Constrainable Property Registration". > > Can we remove the registry? Is there any reason that we can't simply > maintain the document with the definitions of the things we are using? +1 from my perspective (as I've argued before); to me, the spec is the registry; if it helps to have an "official" wiki page where implementors can document experimental constraints they're trying out, I'm happy to set one up. Dom
Received on Monday, 20 April 2015 18:02:19 UTC