- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:16:12 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, TF Chairs, On 18 Sep 2014, at 16:27, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: > To share some thoughts, though this is up to the TF and TF chairs: > > the CfC ends next week, Friday, 26 Sept 2014, so it has to be after that. > > the TF will need to consider any response to the CfC, though a FPWD is generally not an issue. > > thus it seems to me that Thur 2 Oct would be sensible to allow some time post-CfC for prep (though you could aim for Tue 30 Sept, not sure much advantage). Frederick - thanks for the suggestion, the proposed schedule looks good to me. TF Chairs - I’ve prepared a FPWD snapshot, with a proposed FPWD publication date of 02 October 2014 [1]. Please let us know if any changes are needed, or if you’d prefer a different publication date instead. I included the “The document is not complete ...” boilerplate in the SoTD section to set the expectations for people who are reviewing the spec. That status should be implied by the FPWD status, but I guess it is good to be explicit. The FPWD snapshot [1] passes Pubrules [2] and Link Checker [3] so we should be good to go in that regard. [Some broken fragments are expected, since we do not yet define all the interface members, also Link Checker reports broken fragments for the Typed Array spec, but these appears to be false.] Thanks, -Anssi (on behalf of the editors) [1] http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-depth/releases/FPWD.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules [3] http://validator.w3.org/checklink
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 08:16:45 UTC