- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:53:34 -0700
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
I've addressed all the issues brought up in github, and changed the formula. The only nit I didn't change was the whole "all numeric constraints" thing, since I still wasn't sure what text to use. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 9/17/14 11:34 AM, Peter Thatcher wrote: >> >> We could just say "numeric constraints" (remove the word "all") and >> then add a sentence explicitly saying "future constraints may define >> distance formulas other than these" > > > No please don't change the definition, I actually liked it. :-) My concern > was just with the wording. How about removing the examples in parenthesis, > or perhaps put "etc." at the end? Overall just a nit. > >> So we'd need to tweak it a bit: >> >> (actual == ideal) ? 0 : |(actual - ideal)|/max(|ideal|,|actual|) > > > Sounds great! > > .: Jan-Ivar :. >
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 16:54:49 UTC