- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:23:55 -0400
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 11/09/2014 3:21 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> On 9/11/14 3:02 PM, cowwoc wrote:
>> Good point. Remind me again why users shouldn't be allowed to specify
>> the epsilon?
>
> Because it is too complicated and redundant when { aspectRatio: {
> exact: 16/9 } } always works?
>
>> One user might want *exactly* one aspect ratio and another might want
>> something *roughly* around another ratio. Isn't this a business
>> decision?
>
> Use { aspectRatio: { min: 16/9 - business_epsilon/2, max: 16/9 +
> business_epsilon/2 } }
Agreed, but then why have a built-in epsilon on top of the business
epsilon? This makes it hard for people to gauge what actual values
they'll get. When I ask for a specific value, or a specific min/max I
expect *exactly* those values (or a huge epsilon so I can't tell the
difference).
Gili
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 19:26:20 UTC