W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > September 2014

Re: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:12:25 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb+C7agxNhmz2Q8XjxoruvZMCmvn9tkbNkVbYbuFpLWqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

> section 13:
> I don't think WebIDL allows overloading of functions based on the return
> value. (overloading based on the arguments is allowed).
> Can the "promises" versions have different names, or the whole interface
> have a different name?

Why don't we just get rid of the non-Promises API? I think at this point
it's totally OK for specs to depend on Promises.

oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 00:12:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:30 UTC