- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 06:14:53 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2014-05-22 15:33, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 22 May 2014 05:57, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >>> Non-persistent grants of consent can be paused somehow. We didn't >>> agree on the precise control surface. I have proposed the use of >>> "MST.enabled" for this. That causes the active indicator to disappear >>> but the potential indicator remains. For a non-persistent grant, only >>> the track ending causes the indicia to disappear. >> >> I fail to parse the above completely. Should the first "non-persistent >> grant" say "persistent grant"? > > I meant non-persistent. Ah, I think I got it then. In the last sentence saying "track ending causes the indicia to disappear" indicia refers to the potential indicator. > > The concern here is the scenario that Justin explained, and Shijun > also pointed out a scenario with similar characteristics. > > Justin's scenario: An application gains non-persistent consent for > access to a camera, but they want to temporarily suspend the stream. > For instance, my calling app has a mute button. If the active indicia > were to remain, that would be bad. > > Shijun's scenario: An application with non-persistent consent is > suspended. For instance, on a mobile platform, the user switches > between the browser application and another application. The > application is not receiving media because it's suspended. An active > indicator (the light) probably needs to be switched off in this > scenario too. This is right down to the "active indicator" part, but you then say "the light"; I think it was said several times that "the light" is out of control for the UA and that we'd have to rely on it doing the right thing. > >> And, for clarity, the active indicator would of course only disappear if >> all MSTs that use the source are disabled. > > Absolutely. The model to use here is that the track becomes > temporarily disconnected from its source, which allows the source to > transition to a dormant state if no tracks are using it. This turns > off any active indicator. >
Received on Friday, 23 May 2014 06:15:18 UTC