W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Possible Constraint Syntax Compromise

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 18:22:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUG_Z5i6MpwHmTTeFRgbb95dnBKwOwgrs_xQD0f=6P9eeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry <
tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
>> Out of those three, all the people I talked to preferred #3, which is
>> why I have proposed it.  If there is something we are all missing about
>> WebIDL that gives an easier exit from this conundrum, that would be
>> welcome news.
>>
>
> No, it does not surprise me this is not expressible in WebIDL, so I guess
> it will not throw an exception. But we're still required by contract to
> call either the success or error callback, and what it sounded like you
> were saying was that the browser was free to ignore the constraint
> completely and return success.


​Yes, that is what I am proposing.​

> ​
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 01:23:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:27 UTC