- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:40:46 -0400
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On May 19, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 5/18/2014 10:29 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> I've been thinking of "advanced" as "fallback". The problem is that I think we decided to put the advanced stuff first, which is immensely unintuitive to me. > > The advanced stuff is deterministic, while the non-required stuff is less so (UA-ordered), was the reasoning, so put the deterministic stuff first to keep it deterministic. > > In practice only a masochist would use both ways of entering optional constraints in the same call, as the difference is marginal. Advanced gives you more control, it is not a fallback, in my mind. The difference is not marginal, but I agree that advanced gives you more control. It is not a fallback at all, but something for more precise control when the developer is ready for it. > > .: Jan-Ivar :. > >
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 11:41:11 UTC