- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:14:53 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 16/05/2014 1:40 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> Mandatory constraints let software probe without bothering the user >> until there's something to bother the user about. If there's a >> difference here, it's not this. >> >> Why did we invent a whole language to solve this prescriptively - >> "Here's what I want" - to just ask "what do you have?" > That argument doesn't contain enough detail for me to evaluate it. > > We've been living in the tension field between "I want to know so that I > can decide before I ask" and "I want to state what I want and get the > best you can do for me" for several years; the current state of play has > some aspects from each side. > > To my mind, the questions we're debating aren't between black and white, > it's between "somewhat darker" and "a little bit lighter". > > Much harder question. The way I see, if the API lets you query device capabilities directly you can always layer a Javascript library on top which handles "I want to state what I want and get the best you can do for me". The opposite is not true. Meaning, there is no way to express all possible logic on top of a basic language that is inherently more restrictive. To my understanding, the only reason we went down this road was to reduce fingerprinting. It was not to actually simplify the end-user's life. Gili
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 20:15:34 UTC