- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:12:54 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
One thing we need to be careful of is terminology. In particular, the (in retrospect unfortunate) term "stream" probably needs to be avoided, except in the strict sense of MediaStream. It means too many different things to too many people. Example: On 03/13/2014 05:40 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: > I think I get what you mean. This requirement indeed needs to be > addressed, if not in v1, in the later iterations of the spec. One > general solution that scales to N number of streams of any type would > probably be (in abstract) something like what is being proposed as the > MediaDeviceInfo.groupId. Or alternatively, to provide a method that > takes a MediaStream as an argument, and returns other associated > MediaStreams, if any. In this case, it's plain from context that Anssi is talking about MediaStreamTracks, but it is very easy to slip into talking about streams - and it will confuse the issue.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 08:13:23 UTC