- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:27:03 -0700
- To: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2 June 2014 14:14, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote: > All I'm asking for is a form of permissions that survive a page reload, but > don't last forever. Yeah, so I'm saying that would be unacceptable. > If permanent permissions are possible (and presumably > don't involve massively disruptive architectural changes), why aren't less > permanent ones also possible? Just a bit of book-keeping in the UA, I > would think. That's not the concern. We can implement just about any sort of well-defined persistence you can dream up. That's never been the concern. Maybe you can more clearly articulate what you want, and why.
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 21:27:31 UTC