Re: Moving on with noaccess/peerIdentity from Martin Thomson on 2014-02-06 (public-media-capture@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 07:49:57 -0800
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXPbADZkmONyZ2+qqdT6tS-durW9nAECPLjEj_5S2pCBw@mail.gmail.com>

On 6 February 2014 01:01, Stefan Håkansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> The pull request describes the relation between identity protected
> tracks and PeerConnection; but perhaps all of that should be in the
> WebRTC doc? Otherwise we set a precedence here and would have to
> describe what happens for all uses of MediaStreams and 'Tracks
> (Recorder, ImageCapture, what else comes down the road).

I really don't mind where the text lives.  In theory WebRTC could
include all the relevant text, amending the gUM objects accordingly.
I don't mind.

> Nit: in the pull request it is not mentioned what happens if a
> MediaStreamTrack with peerIdentity is cloned. That must be described.

Harald made the same comment.  Yes.

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 15:50:24 UTC