- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:28:06 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Yes, this is correct (and I was wondering about how to make this point without derailing the discussion.) It is only the constraint _set_ that is optional. If any single constraint in the set fails, the whole set fails. - Jim On 8/5/2014 12:22 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 08/05/2014 04:16 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >> Slides in case this comes up today (I had to scramble last time): >> >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pql9zGhtX8r84qdnGFuSZM0aOMOHBxXVbkJsXwbCI0k/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> .: Jan-Ivar :. >> >> > I've disagreed enough on the main topic that it's not worth repeating, > but I'll call out another one from this deck: > > I happen to disagree with the formulation of the advanced-array: The > individual constraints are as mandatory as they otherwise are, it's > the entire advanced-array element that is optional / ignorable. > > An advanced-array element either succeeds or fails; there is no > picking individual items from it. > > -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 16:28:38 UTC