Re: Bare values read as "just this value please" from Harald Alvestrand on 2014-08-05 (public-media-capture@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:22:53 +0200
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Message-ID: <53E104DD.10206@alvestrand.no>

On 08/05/2014 04:16 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> Slides in case this comes up today (I had to scramble last time):
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pql9zGhtX8r84qdnGFuSZM0aOMOHBxXVbkJsXwbCI0k/edit?usp=sharing 
>
>
> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
>
I've disagreed enough on the main topic that it's not worth repeating, 
but I'll call out another one from this deck:

I happen to disagree with the formulation of the advanced-array: The 
individual constraints are as mandatory as they otherwise are, it's the 
entire advanced-array element that is optional / ignorable.

An advanced-array element either succeeds or fails; there is no picking 
individual items from it.

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 16:23:25 UTC