- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:38:17 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-media-capture@w3.org
Le mardi 10 septembre 2013 à 15:29 +0200, Harald Alvestrand a écrit : > Some of these (the full URL interface, for instance) are cross-document > references - what's the recommended procedure for making sure those are > available? The WebIDL checker currently operates with a pre-defined set of well-known interfaces, and URL is not part of that set. In practice, since we're moving away from relying on that particular interface, it probably is not a big deal; I have nevertheless filed an issue on the checker to add it: https://github.com/dontcallmedom/webidl-checker/issues/6 Raising an issue on the checker repository is probably the best approach for missing cross-references at this stage: https://github.com/dontcallmedom/webidl-checker/issues/new In general, this is a part of the checker that I want to improve: ideally, it would automatically load interfaces that are defined in normative references linked from the spec being checked; that's more involved, so probably won't happen very soon, but will avoid these false positives: https://github.com/dontcallmedom/webidl-checker/issues/7 HTH, Dom
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 08:38:35 UTC