Re: Proposal: Time out for getUserMedia.

Hi,
Thanks for creating this as a bug.

I agree that number of likes are less for this proposal, than that of the
dislikes.
But I don't agree that "nobody actually speaking out in support", because
few people are accepting this.
Even though there are some dislikes for this proposal, I have not find any
strong reason for that dislike so far.

Thanks,
Kiran.



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

> On 09/07/2013 06:35 AM, Kiran Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Are there any objections on this proposal.
>> Can we add this to bugzilla/bug tracker, to discuss further and spec it ?
>>
>>  With my chair hat on:
> I've created the bug (23194), https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**
> Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23194<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23194>
>
> But when I review the discussion so far, I have seen a lot of skepticism
> and "how would this work", and nobody actually speaking out in support of
> the idea.
>
> It is possible that this is something that should be left for a later
> version of the spec.
>
> (I'll also note that if I've understood how Futures/Promises are supposed
> to work, this is much more easily supported, with no special API
> whatsoever, in a version of getUserMedia that uses futures instead of
> callbacks. That may argue for leaving it for the proposed future spec
> version that supports futures.)
>
>             Harald
>