- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 05:48:17 +0000
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23194
Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
--- Comment #1 from Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> ---
I'd like to propose a variation of this proposal.
Instead of specifying a timeout, developers should be able to cancel a
getUserMedia() call at any arbitrary time.
If we implement a mechanism similar to setInterval(), clearInterval() then
users will be able to cancel after a timeout (as Kiran suggested) as well as
due to external (server-driven) events. This has UX benefits.
Use-case: A user enters a video conferencing bridge. Before she grants
permission to the camera, the call ends and all users are ejected from the
room.
Instead of asking users to respond to a stale prompt, the server can abort the
operation and notify the user that the call has ended.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 05:48:20 UTC