- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:31:40 +0100
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > The widget would not only have to be written by a third party, but actually > hosted on their domain. And not just optionally, but for some reason the > widget provider has decided not to allow the author to host it on their own > domain. That's fairly common though, consider eg YouTube. > Sure, it could happen, but it seems somewhat far-fetched to me. On the other > hand, allowing MediaStream graphs to span domains could have potentially > far-reaching consequences. I don't see any need to rush into this. It's not entirely clear to me what you mean by this. Are these concerns specific to MediaStream and not applicable to Blob? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 12:32:07 UTC