On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly, > what > > are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer? > > E.g. embedding a widget for video or audio manipulation. The widget > could be written by a third-party of sorts. > The widget would not only have to be written by a third party, but actually hosted on their domain. And not just optionally, but for some reason the widget provider has decided not to allow the author to host it on their own domain. Sure, it could happen, but it seems somewhat far-fetched to me. On the other hand, allowing MediaStream graphs to span domains could have potentially far-reaching consequences. I don't see any need to rush into this. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 12:26:20 UTC