- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:43:15 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10/21/13 4:14 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> Thanks for feedback. >> >> I see from the github doc that InternalStructuredClone will take a >> "targetRealm" input, and I assume you mean that we need have that >> covered in the InternalStructuredClone algorithm for MediaStream. >> >> Is that right? > > Yeah. How exactly the extensibility hook is going to work is not > completely figured out yet. I suspect it'll take a while before this > whole thing moves to JavaScript. > > >> If so I guess we need to device a InternalStructuredClone algorithm that >> takes a targetRealm input. Do you see "targetRealm" coming soon, or >> would something like I proposed be sufficient for now? > > It seems alright for now. Although I would encourage you to refer to > the built-in MediaStream.prototype.clone() method, so that if the > developer overrides it, you don't use that. (Alternatively define an > abstract clone operation and define clone() in terms of that. That's > what I usually do as it's somewhat clearer.) This (abstract clone) sounds interesting. Could you provide a link to an example? > > >> (Anne, sorry for spamming you, by mistake a missed the public- list in >> my first response) > > It seems going via the list is faster o_O. > >
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 14:43:42 UTC