- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:14:48 +0100
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > Thanks for feedback. > > I see from the github doc that InternalStructuredClone will take a > "targetRealm" input, and I assume you mean that we need have that > covered in the InternalStructuredClone algorithm for MediaStream. > > Is that right? Yeah. How exactly the extensibility hook is going to work is not completely figured out yet. I suspect it'll take a while before this whole thing moves to JavaScript. > If so I guess we need to device a InternalStructuredClone algorithm that > takes a targetRealm input. Do you see "targetRealm" coming soon, or > would something like I proposed be sufficient for now? It seems alright for now. Although I would encourage you to refer to the built-in MediaStream.prototype.clone() method, so that if the developer overrides it, you don't use that. (Alternatively define an abstract clone operation and define clone() in terms of that. That's what I usually do as it's somewhat clearer.) > (Anne, sorry for spamming you, by mistake a missed the public- list in > my first response) It seems going via the list is faster o_O. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 14:15:19 UTC