Re: Constraints as a separate interface

On 2013-10-07 00:10, Jim Barnett wrote:
> Here’s an attempt to separate constraints out into a separate
> interface.   The point is to allow other specs, such as MediaRecorder,
> to refer to it and ensure that they are all using constraints
> consistently.  This does _/not/_ change the semantics of constraints, it
> would just break them out into a separate interface.  This interface
> would still be defined in the MediaCapture spec, but in a separate
> section.  (There would be editorial changes throughout the spec to refer
> to this interface, but, again, the semantics of Tracks and Streams
> wouldn’t change.)

Thanks Jim. This looks good to me, and having constrainable as a 
separate interface will be really helpful since there are a number of 
places were we will (or discuss) use constraints.

Stefan

>
> -Jim
>