W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > May 2013

RE: questions about direct assignment

From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:55:22 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281042724@GENSJZMBX02.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
Isn't the alternative to just let origin rules apply to each Track independent of the others?  Do we need to define the origin of the MediaStream at all?  Just asking. There may be a good reason, but it seems simpler to me to let cross-origin constraints apply to each Track separately.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:52 AM
To: Robert O'Callahan
Cc: Jim Barnett; public-media-capture@w3.org
Subject: Re: questions about direct assignment

On 29 May 2013 18:50, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> In some cases the state of a MediaStream can change from "access 
> allowed from origin X" to "no access allowed from any origin". For 
> example if we have a MediaStream which contains a track from origin A, 
> and then someone adds a track from origin B.

That's really just to say that the rules apply to tracks and that grouping tracks into a stream causes the track with the lowest accessibility to determine the accessibility of all tracks.
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:55:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:17 UTC