- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:58:49 +0200
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Le samedi 13 juillet 2013 à 18:51 +0000, Stefan Håkansson LK a écrit : > but for everyone in the meeting I think it was very clear that people > were not convinced that we should switch to Future's (aren't they called > "Promises" now BTW?) for the "Media Capture and Streams" document or for > the WebRTC 1.0 document. > > Dom, representing W3C Staff, would you agree to the above? Indeed; Alex Russell's personal summary of the call (which obviously can't be suspected of any bias against Futures/Promises) hints to this as well: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Jun/0011.html Dom
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 18:59:06 UTC