Re: Image Capture Proposal

I get the feeling that you guys (Jim and Travis) are talking about 
different interfaces here. Jim, you mean the "Constrainable" interface 
right? I talked to Dan about that and he wanted to get the first version 
of the Settings proposal in before we started to change stuff. Since the 
functionality that will go into the "Constrainable" interface is being 
incorporated into the Media Capture document, and all specs that would 
want to use it is dependent on that document, I think it should just be 
extracted from it's current interface and put into a section of its own 
in the same document.

/Adam

On 2013-02-20 02:08, Travis Leithead wrote:
> I think we either start a new unique document for it, or we add it as
> a new unique section to the recording API spec, slightly stretching
> its scope. I think I prefer the latter option since I envision the
> recording and image capture proposals to move to Rec at roughly the
> same pace (e.g., implementations would probably want to implement
> them both at the same time?)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Barnett [mailto:Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:23 AM
>> To: Stefan Håkansson LK; public-media-capture@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: Image Capture Proposal
>>
>> I'd be happy to work on this interface.  Where would it go?

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 06:03:41 UTC