- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:27:48 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:27:18 UTC
On 08/27/2013 11:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Harald Alvestrand > <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> I prefer copy-by-pointer to copy-by-cut/paste; describing the behaviour of >> CreateObjectURL(MediaStream) in terms of CreateObjectURL(Blob) seems like a >> Good Thing to me. >> >> We don't want these behaviours to evolve independently. > Agreed. To do that properly while still keeping MediaStream in your > own draft you should ask for a hook in the File API specification and > then use it. > > Thanks for the advice! Would that be the same as sending a note to the editors asking that the URL http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#creating-revoking be kept as a stable reference, because we want to refer to it? I'm not sure what a "hook in the File API specification" actually means.
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:27:18 UTC